Posts made by Aecydn

At the current mana cost, yes, I agree. However if the mana cost was increased to compensate for the increase in spell power then it would be fine. It would allow characters to do what the spell suggests; "Cure Critical." Recovering smaller amounts of HP would be done through "Light" and cost much less and be a common bandaid-style spell, with "Serious" mana costing somewhere inbetween the two and having more power as a trade off. It would make a more effective use of cure spells as a whole. In the current setup it seems nobody bothers with "Light" or "Serious" and most use "Heal" instead of "Critical" anyway (I use Critical) so it would make sense to either make these spells useful and add more strategy to their implementation or delete them if nobody wants to use them (Noooooooo! :P ). Also, if anyone knows, what are the actual mana costs for "Critical/Serious/Light" and "Heal" and their HP% in comparison? Comments?

Just wondering about other peoples usage of "cure critical" as opposed to "cure serious" or "cure light" and whether it was a mana-effective spell for the amount of health restored.

From using "cure critical" all the time I think it could do with a boost to its effectiveness or be a lower type spell. To me it seems pointless to restore less health than what "cure critical" does through lesser spells like "serious" or "light."

It would be good to have "cure critcial" restore atleast 50%-75%, "serious" restore 25%-50% and "light" restore 10%-25%.
If anyone knows the actual HP% please let me know.

All I'm saying is that in my opinion casting "cure critical" 7 times in a row to get back to full health seems more like a "cure light" effect.

Would love peoples opinions on this topic as am still young to Sentience.

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ You have become better at %%Disconnected from server. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ *oh the joys of dialup internet*