Arena


  • newly_registered

    Oookay, I don't really give a shit how much I die in arena but. What the hell is the point of trying to become a strong character with stats to back it up when people way higher level come erase all progress you made by capping you after a sucess. I also like myths Idea of disabling flee. Flee is bullshit fight the damn fight and if you are going to die you deseve the point for losses. Making the players auto recall after a fight is cool to. You should still have a walk in arena so people can do arenas informally and such. Tis all.

  • registered

    Yeah, Syn it can be a problem at times. If possible make those that walk in be out of phase so to speak with those that are transported in. And even transported in for different battles out of phase with each other. You can see and watch others fight, but can not affect/be affected by them,. This would also prevent area affects from "accidently" drawi ng in viewers. Not sure on plausibility of this, but hey it a suggestion. Again leaving those that walk in to fend for themselves.

  • registered

    I disagree completely about disabling flee. Personally, I don't flee and run off to go hide in safe when I fight somebody. A better solution would be to close off the exits to the arena once a challenge is accepted, so that your opponent can run from you, but can't hide in safe. I think player vs. player combat should be a dynamic thing, not stay in the same place bashing each other in the face til one person dies kinda thing. I think character fighting style is an important part of roleplay, and part of Pravus' roleplay is to bite someone, end combat by fleeing, then come back and finish that person off with a crossbow bolt to the back of the skull. Maybe another solution with flee in comparison to the current lag after fleeing from another player would be to require some sort of deception or opportunity to flee, such as being able to flee after kicking dirt in someones eyes, or fleeing after your opponent fails a bash attempt on you. Maybe a flee skill, that, based on skill%, would give you a deceptive move and an opportunity to flee. The higher ones percent in the skill would allow different deception/flees. "Pravus nimbly backflips out of the way from your attack! With catlike reflexes Pravus lands and flees past you under your attacks!" "Balder misses his ass and falls flat on his backside! "With a tremedous leap, Pravus soars over Balder and out of the room! Pravus fires a sniper rifle at Balder!

  • registered

    I'll validate my point for disabling flee from a challenge. And Prav, I'll use you as an example for this ;) Lets say you challenge me, openly to the game and formally. This is considered a formal challenge. Because of the formality of it, fleeing is disabled to make it an honest fight. Not one where you can web my sorry ass and shoot me with bolts from the next room. If you want to shoot me with bolts, do it in combat. Auto-Recall after the fight is over is actually not a *great* idea. I'll remove that, but I'd say add in a 15 second grace period to give the person time to get back to safe or whatever it is they are going to do. This will give the person to skull their prize, loot the gold, sac the corpse, and whatever else is needed. While Room Shield would still be a problem *lets say spunky RS'ed the arena recall while you and i fought, to ensure him getting the spoils of war*, I'd say make the arena considered outside so that it cannot be RS'ed. If someone is to make a formal challenge and then flee from battle, the person is just wasting the other person's time. Many times have I challenged someone, only for them to accept and run to safe after a formal beat down session.

  • registered

    After an arena battle due to challenge finishes i believe both participates should be transported back to where they came from instantly after the match. I think the corpse should be autosacked, to prevent random players skulling their corpse. Other players should still be allowed to freely walk in if wanted to, but would not be able to interfere with an ongoing fight and would not be able to kill the winner. That way if people want to go in and have a mass killing orgy with lots of people, they can still do this.

  • registered

    Myth, your points are very well taken. With formal challenges it makes sense that the combatants wouldn't flee from each other. Maybe fleeing from an opponent would count as an arena loss for the person fleeing, and maybe even a victory for the other person. I still think that a flee skill would be very fun to have in the game, and I can see both rogues and ninjas getting this skill. :envy:

  • registered

    I still like my idea, where you go to a whole new arena, where only you and the other person can attack one another, and have people watch, but add what myth said with the extra 15 secs of time to get all cor, find all the bolts and arrows the enemy missed with. Whole point is, an arena battle is a challenge between 2 people, not 2 people and someone waiting for the kill to be finished so they can cheaply steal a kill, and ruin success of the other fighter. Biggest problem is, I use smite a lot in combat, and it creates a whole lot of lag, and then if someone is waiting, they can walk up, and attack me, and fleeing away adds lag, and a level 50 vrs 120 will last a turn, maybe. And it is hard to flee all the way across the arena as well. Balder

  • registered

    especially when a good portion of the time I'd follow the person because of having pursuit. :P

  • registered

    I didnt read the whole thing but this might be an easy solution. Person A challenges person B. Make it so that only those two can attack each other/be attacked until the crier announces a winner or they flee and leave the arena. But then that raises the question of well if Person A flees from the arena then someone else (Person C) can come in outa nowhere and attack the person who didnt flee right? Make it so that if Person A flees the arena Person B still cant be attacked or attack until he leaves. Sorry if its hard to understand but I think you get the idea.

  • registered

    How about this for a simple solution… Challenge would transport to a side of the arena where max occupancy of room is 2, with direct access to the safe room or make winner instantly transported to safe room as well as loser. Other players wishing to watch can do so from the lounge area of arena, by adding a feature which would work similar to third eye, like a TV.. perhaps a reflective pool..? Without challenge, 2 player max room would be closed. Only entrance is through challenge.

  • registered

    I still feel that formal challenges should make flee disabled and the winner safe from attack for 15 seconds to allow looting of the corpse, skulling, and sac'ing for dp, as well as time to run to safe.

  • registered

    Or to be summoned to Argyle and run the river with impunity.

  • registered

    ~~@Ithilidin:~~ > Or to be summoned to Argyle and run the river with impunity. 6 Well to stop that, just nosummon from the arena allowed and once you hit the safe room in arena it ends. :)

  • retired

    I think the idea of ALL arena fights being a no-flee thing doesn't appeal to me very much because it would make them a little less interesting and maybe put people who don't have a warrior class at a little bit of a disadvantage. This is keeping in mind that eventually I plan on removing the 1/1/1/1 class requirements for people and make it a bit more free-choice (when I do this I plan on allowing older players to change their classes somehow without having to restart, if they wish to do so). However I totally support the idea being able to fight such a battle if you choose - I think I could stick in something like "challenge [switch1|switch2…]" to where you could specify conditions for the match. For example, two ideas for the conditions coming from this fine discussion could be no-flee and 1on1 (or whatever, the names arn't really important). So if you typed chal Ertai noflee 1on1 and Ertai accepted, you and him would have to fight a match in which fleeing was disabled, and nobody else was allowed to attack either attacker until one of them died or left the arena. Or you could just do chal 1on1 to allow fleeing, but still keep the attackers safe, or just the good old chal for a no-holds barred thing. Think this would encompass some of the diff. ideas people have asked. Feel free to add up some more ideas for conditions (should we call them battle rules or something?) on arena matches here. I'm trying to keep this topic alive so I don't forget to do something about it :D

  • registered

    singles == one on one only, loser is transported to the beginning, winner is safe until reaching the beginning (allowing skulling of corpse and looting of wealth) noflee == neither party may flee boxing == neither person may use spells, scrolls, potions, or music. npk == loser actually dies and goes to void, loser gets a pk loss and winner gets a pk win. cpk == loser actually dies and leaves behind all equipment in corpse. winner only may loot the corpse and skull the corpse, also retaining a cpk win. loser gains a cpk loss. ironman == best of 3\. When person dies, they are fully regen'ed naked and must wear eq. other person does not get regen'ed. person who gets 3 wins wins the iron man match.

Log in to reply